12-year-olds to be vaccinated without parental consent in San Francisco
June 4, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — In a health order released April 28, 2021, the City of San Francisco officially allowed children as young as 12 to take the coronavirus vaccine without parental notification or consent.
The health order was issued even though the vaccines have not been fully approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but are merely given an emergency use authorization.
Indeed, the order argues that “[i]n the coming months, not only is it likely that the authorization for such vaccines will be expanded (both in terms of the numbers of vaccines but also in terms of non-emergency approval), but it is also likely that the age range of those who are authorized to receive the vaccine in the United States will be expanded to allow for more minors to receive the vaccine.”
The document urged that “although many people have received the COVID-19 vaccines, it is critical from a public health perspective that as many people as possible, including minors, receive the vaccine.”
The San Francisco Department of Health justified this decision by referring to prior cases that allowed for children to give their own consent: “This ability to consent is similar to the concept used elsewhere in state law that minors 12 years old or older may consent to the diagnosis or treatment of infectious diseases, including specifically COVID-19, without parental consent. Allowing prevention of the disease via vaccination is just as important as allowing a minor to be tested for that disease or to be treated for it.”
LifeSiteNews reached out to Executive Director, Michael Ramey of ParentalRights.org, a non-profit political action group working to pass legislation that protects families, to comment on the issue of consent.
“The U.S. Supreme Court recognized decades ago that most children, even in adolescence, are not yet ready to make the kind of long term, potentially life-altering decisions often involved in their medical care,” he said. “The Court rightly declared that it is the proper role of parents to make those judgments. Yet today, we are seeing a flood of orders like this one that ignore this vital parental role. Claiming to give a child ‘freedom’ to make their own decision, all they really do is rob the child of the protection that fit, loving, older and wiser parents can give them from a wrong decision. Such orders put children’s lives at risk, and should be discarded for the unconstitutional rubbish that they are.”
“It isn’t ‘freedom’ if the only time the law empowers a minor to defy her parents is when she’s making the decision the government wants her to make in the first place,” Ramey continued. “That’s not freedom: it’s coercion of a minor who has been stripped of her defenses.”
Children and vaccines
The coronavirus is no grave threat for children and teenagers.
America’s Frontline Doctors issued a white paper indicating that the survival rate of children under 19 years that have contracted the coronavirus is 99.997%. There are known complications with the vaccines, the white paper declares, including the immune enhancement whereby “anti-COVID antibodies, stimulated by a vaccine, amplify the infection rather than prevent its damage.” Other possible side effects, as listed by the FDA, include death, heart attacks, stroke, and blood disorders.
Dr. Paul Alexander, a physician writing for the American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) explains that there are almost no instances of asymptomatic spread of the virus. Further, he is arguing that children do not need to be vaccinated, and that herd immunity can happen through day-to-day contact in schools. Alexander told Laura Ingraham on Fox News’ “The Ingraham Angle” that “[t]he risk to children is so small, there is no reason to put our children in harm’s way at this point. Not with these untested vaccines. This is reckless.”
Alexander said, “Ludvigsson published a seminal paper in the New England Journal of Medicine on COVID-19 among children 1 to 16 years of age and their teachers in Sweden. From the nearly 2 million children that were followed in school in Sweden, it was reported that with no mask mandates, there were zero deaths from COVID and a few instances of transmission and minimal hospitalization.”
There is hesitancy to vaccinate children due to “lack of confidence in the vaccine” according to the WHO.
Emergency Use Authorization for vaccines
The FDA has issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for three coronavirus vaccines. An EUA can only granted to a medication or vaccine if there are no alternative treatments available, but it doesn’t amount to an actual approval of that medication of vaccine, with proper testing before.
On May 10, 2021, the FDA officially extended the EUA to include children aged 12 to 15 for the Pfizer vaccine. The Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines have still not been given an EUA for adolescents.
The Order, the San Francisco Department of Health claims, is both reasonable and necessary because it is “issued based on evidence of continued community transmission of COVID-19 within the City, throughout the Bay Area, across California, and across the United States; evidence that most COVID-19 infections are caused by people who have no symptoms at all of illness.”
The health risks, the department argues, are serious enough to warrant such an order.
“[T]he age, condition, and health of a significant portion of the population of the City places it at risk for serious health complications, including death, from COVID-19; further evidence that others, including younger and otherwise healthy people, are also at risk for serious outcomes including death; evidence that breakthrough infections can occur in fully vaccinated people; and the reality that SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 diagnoses remain prevalent throughout the world.”
Terminate the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and Complete Phase 3 Trials
April 27, 2021 (The UNZ Review) The American people are not being told the truth about Covid, masks, social distancing, lockdowns, mortality or vaccines. In fact, the only thing of which we can be 100 percent certain, is that the government, the public health officials and the media have been lying relentlessly and remorselessly on virtually every topic for the better part of the last year. As far as I can see, lying has become the official state policy. Am I wrong?
For example, we are now being told that the sudden uptick in deaths in various parts the country, are the sign of a “4th Wave”. Naturally, these fatalities are being blamed on the “variant” which is the current ‘hobgoblin du jour.’ What the media and the pundits fail to mention is that the unexpected rise in cases and deaths is only taking place in areas that are engaged in mass vaccination campaigns, a fact that can be easily extrapolated from the chart below.
We are living in the dawn of a Medical Apartheid dictated by unqualified and unelected billionaires attempting to usher in a Digital Surveillance Grid to police Corporate Mandated Medical Interventions.
While dangerous fanatics claim ownership of your mind and body; friends and family cheer them on.
It is easy to feel ANGRY and POWERLESS.
Ignored by professional liars in public office, it is time to remind them: WE ARE THE AUTHORITY.
We assert our entitlement to work, travel, congregate and provide food and shelter. To keep private property, private lifestyles and private medical records: Protected by a new judiciary founded on the Legitimate Authority of the Public, not the current system under which this Human Rights Crisis persists.
Here is a detailed description of the best defense against the technocratic dictatorship bearing down on us. It is the reason this project exists, its intended goal and ideal outcome.
Group A recognize The Great Reset as a thinly veiled attempt to revolutionize global culture into a system of technocratic totalitarianism. Group B accept the alleged pandemic at face value. They see a threat to life and every removal of freedom is a temporary inconvenience advised by sincere and benevolent experts. When you speak of totalitarianism to Group B, it sounds kooky:
The alleged pandemic is alive in their minds, they see it every day. Total state control exists in the imagination. It is yet to reach full throttle. The incremental steps towards a despotic future have been sold to us as voluntary guidelines.
Group B care about themselves and each other and you and me. An overzealous police service enforcing rules with violence and extortion is justifiable when you believe that breaking rules places the public in danger. A Medical Apartheid keeping dangerous people away from the public appears somewhat preferable; freedom passports, unhealthy masks and humiliating rituals imposed by shops and services are mere precautions, not insidious techniques of social engineering.
Rather than battle each and every expression of fascism, it would be more effective to stop this at the source.
We are being coerced by an intricate racketeering scam. It is easily evidenced without speculative talk of totalitarianism and it doesn’t require science:
Racketeering is a criminal activity in which a person or organization creates a problem for the purpose of solving that problem through extortion.
Organizations responsible for ‘Covid’ policies have created a situation in which vast profits can be made for investors.
This is the first domino. Properly addressed, it will bring an immediate end to all ‘coronavirus legislation’ and the subsequent chain reaction will bring The Great Reset to a humiliating conclusion. Until then; all government, courts, police and media may be assumed collaborators in organized crime. They will not arrest themselves, so we must hold them accountable. The authority to act is already ours, but we lack clout. Without the power to arrest, nothing will change. This capability only comes with a perceived majority.
Our goal is to find ONE THIRD of the population with the courage and morality to BECOME THE AUTHORITY. When we have a visible, cohesive assembly, Group B will recognize the Legitimate Authority of the Public and together we guarantee the accused a non-violent arrest and a fair trial.
This project is concerned with the nature of authority. Everything is founded on one simple truth. To stop tyranny you should fully understand THE PRINCIPLE.
Tyranny will persist until we confront our irresponsible attitude towards authority.
An individual has authority over themselves and no other. No other has authority over the individual. This is Legitimate Authority.
Legitimate Authority is the immutable virtue of every living soul. Each of us are free to do anything we choose, limited only by everyone else’s freedom to choose: My choice ends when it overrules your choice.
Authority is the absence of doubt. You eradicate doubt by adhering to immovable truth: That which was true 1000 years ago and will be true in another 1000.
An individual has authority over themselves and no other. No other has authority over the individual.
This principle can be applied to any conflict. This principle cannot be altered, therefore something else must give: All external authority is illegitimate.
Once you accept this, the doubt ends.
You BECOME THE AUTHORITY.
PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF LEGITIMATE AUTHORITY
Tyranny is centralized by nature and exists when Illegitimate Authority appears legitimate.
A decentralized resistance can undermine dependency on Illegitimate Authority; but a small, organized force can still dominate.
When we strengthen our own authority with the morality and courage to defend each others authority we can have our decentralized world incapable of suffering top down tyranny, and also the power of the majority to provide justice.
We don’t have to agree with each other, we don’t need to like each other. Just respect Legitimate Authority and reject all external, nonconsensual authority in as distinguishable, confident manner as possible until the world sees a tangible new majority of determined, good people. Until each and every one of us understands our own freedom and commands our own authority with confidence whilst retaining every wild idiosyncratic characteristic we care to express.
We are Humanity and we are deserving and capable and we are devastating to wickedness when we recognize each other.
THE COVID TRIBUNAL
The correct response to a pandemic is to make available impartial, accurate information, encourage open debate and allow people to act on their own judgement.
The Covid health policies have caused discernible harm. The presence of a virus does not – can not – make it legal to cause harm and those responsible will be brought to trial.
Through influence on government guidelines, mandates and legislation the World Health Organization have instigated intolerable interference in the affairs of private life and free business.
From the threat of revoked licenses for noncompliance to offers of funding and bailouts for collaborating. Incessant flattery of healthcare workers. The overbalance of police in non-criminal matters. Restricted movement, reduced ability to provide for oneself, unfathomable rules with direct impact on health, finance and relationships. Forced closure of business. The loss of jobs, homes and LIFE. We are told the only way to end the interference is to consume a rushed-to-market industrial chemical gene modification of which governments have granted ‘vaccine liability indemnity’ to the manufacturers.
Globally, the same governments have pledged billions of taxpayer dollars to fund a ‘vaccine rollout’ creating vast profits for manufacturers and pharmaceutical investors. It would be irresponsible not to consider the probability of conflict of interest, corruption and FRAUD. Given the apparent absence of journalistic integrity; from disproportionate coverage to outright censorship, the plausibility of media COLLUSION is not unreasonable to an intelligent and inquiring observer.
I hereby make a declaration of reasonable suspicion that government, local authorities, emergency services, health care professionals and corporate media are under the influence of unlawful private interests and should, henceforth, be regarded in the Judiciary, Academia and Free Press with legitimate suspicion.
THE PUBLIC TRIBUNALS
I don’t want an internet fact hacker to dictate what’s true or false. This is not a job for ‘Snopes‘ or ‘Wikipedia‘. I want an independent court to investigate to a professional standard.
THE PUBLIC TRIBUNALS are for anyone possessed of reasonable doubt about the wisdom or honesty of so-called leaders. You who recognize sinister implications when politicians grant themselves power to fight biology, drugs, terrorism, even climate change. We live in times when pseudoscience and rumor dominate the news. We are cajoled and coerced into accepting radical impositions on the word of unqualified strangers (a politician I have never met absolutely lacks the insight and integrity to micromanage my daily life).
A public tribunal will bring an end to doubt, speculation and fear – and simultaneously restrain this enthusiasm for authoritarianism. Only a fair trial can adequately quash any ‘rumor’, ‘conspiracy theory’ or ‘fake news’; removing all suspicion about the fanaticism of politicians, journalists and billionaires.
We don’t seek help from those we implicate, instead we organize for ourselves an open, free and global inquiry. An independent public tribunal with the full cooperation of the World Health Organization, World Economic Forum, all government employees, corporate media and with the support of all police services.
Noncooperation will be regarded with appropriate mistrust.
THE PUBLIC TRIBUNALS will be administrated by qualified professionals in criminal investigation and criminal prosecution who can be demonstrated to hold no conflicts of interest. It will be funded by our money already collected from us in taxes. It will be held in our publicly owned courthouses. It will be broadcast live by the BBC World Service as a matter of public health, economic security and individual freedom.
Only a fair trial can determine guilt. If all parties are found to be innocent, we are at the very least in a strong position to ensure that our ability to act on our own judgement is never infringed upon again.
California is being overrun with bad bills that encourage racism, drug abuse, sex trafficking, assisted suicide
May 26, 2021 (California Family Council) – The California Family Council (CFC) been overwhelmed this year with the number of harmful bills being introduced by California legislators. We have 19 bills we oppose that threaten the unborn, parental rights, freedom of speech and religion, and encourage racism, drug abuse, sex trafficking, and assisted suicide.
The bills we supported this year to promote religious liberty, provide sex education transparency, and protect children from sex abusers are dead or pushed off until next year. Most of the 19 bills CFC is opposing made it through the committee process in the legislative house they were introduced. And now over the next two weeks, 40 members of the State Senate and the 80 members of the Assembly have to vote on these and hundreds of other bills before the June 4 deadline, if they are going to survive and make it to the other legislative house for consideration.
AB 101: Mandatory Ethnic Studies courses for high school students: This bill will mandate high school students take a course in “ethnic studies” in order to graduate high school. The curriculum is infused with Critical Race Theory meant to create resentment among non-white students, and guilt and shame among white students. Lessons falsely tell students to feel guilty for crimes done by long-dead figures with the same color skin. The curriculum seeks to pit ethnic groups and those with various sexual and gender identities against each other. It also encourages teens to judge people not by the content of their character, but by the racial or sexual identity group they belong to. Read more about the curriculum here.
AB 338: Replace the statue of St. Junipero Serra with a monument to the California Native people of Sacramento. Last year a mob torched and pulled down a statue of Father Junipero Serra, the Catholic priest credited with establishing the mission system in California in the 1700s. Caving to the demands of the mob, this bill would remove a legal requirement to have a statue honoring the Father’s work among the Indians. In its place will be a monument to Native Americans that will highlight the devastating impact the mission period had on them and the role Father Serra had in that devastation. CFC is all for an honest portrayal of historical figures, but believes that debate can happen without giving in to mobs that use vandalism to argue their point of view. Watch CFC interview for more information.
AB 1040: Ethnic Studies in community colleges: This bill would require each community college to offer courses in ethnic studies at each of its campuses. As mentioned previously, Ethnic Studies is a Critical Race Theory course of study meant to create resentment and prejudice between students with different ethnicities and sexual identities.
AB 1084: Gender-neutral section requirement for big-box stores: This bill would punish companies with fines if they don’t create a gender-neutral section for kids’ toys and clothing. The law, sponsored by a gender-neutral fashion designer, would only apply to retail stores with 500 or more employees and demand that the gender-neutral section include a “reasonable selection” of items without any store signage labeling the items for boys or girls. The first violation is $250 or $500 for subsequent violations. Read this article for more information.
AB 1184: Require insurance companies to keep secrets from parents: This Planned Parenthood-sponsored bill will force insurance companies to hide from parents “sensitive” medical procedures given to their adult and minor children. These “sensitive” services include abortion, sexual assault treatment, drug abuse and mental health treatment, and cross-sex hormones and sex-change operations. The bill prevents parents from finding out from an insurance statement that their child is receiving services from medical providers like Planned Parenthood. In California, a minor can get an abortion at any age without parental knowledge or consent.
ACA 2: Constitutional amendment to eliminate the death penalty: This bill would prohibit the death penalty from being imposed as a punishment for any violations of law, even for the most heinous mass murderers with overwhelming evidence of guilt. This bill would have to be approved by a vote of the people.
HR 51 & SR 39: LGBT Pride Month resolution: These resolutions celebrate “pride” in policies, laws, and court decisions that reject God’s design for marriage, sexual behavior, and biological sex. These bills also advocate for the passage of the Equality Act, a federal bill that would mandate government-imposed inequality and unfairness by requiring acceptance of a particular ideology about sexual ethics, while leaving no room for differing opinions and legitimate public debate. Read more here.
SB 2: Police lose jobs over “bias” acts: This bill would, among other things, redefine “serious misconduct” for which a police officer might lose their job. The new definition states: “Acts demonstrating bias on the basis of race, national origin, religion, gender identity or expression, housing status, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, or other protected status in violation of law.” Acts of “bias” is a very vague term and easily manipulable, because it involves not just conduct, but speech regarding personal religious, philosophical, or political views. Read a legal analysis here.
SB 17: Office of Racial Equity: This bill will create an independent office of racial equity that would develop a Racial Equity Framework to create policies and practices to promote racial equity, and address individual, institutional, and structural racism. The bill assumes all inequity in the United States between racial, sexual orientation, or gender groups is the result of racism built into the system. Though vague in details, the bill implies that racial equity will not be achieved by supporting policies that judge someone based on individual character and merit without concern for race, gender, or sexual orientation. Instead, equity will only be achieved with policies that give special preferences to individuals based on the racial, gender, or sexual orientation group they belong to.
SB 57: Illegal drug injection sites: This bill would start a pilot program in San Francisco, Oakland, and Los Angeles where centers would be set up so drug addicts can use illicit drugs under medical supervision. The idea is to prevent drug addicts from overdosing, but ignores the effects of enabling the devastating effects of illegal drugs on the body, and the negative effects that illegal drugs have on the health of the community. Read more information here.
SB 70: Mandatory kindergarten: This bill requires a child to have completed one year of kindergarten before that child may be admitted to the first grade. This bill violates parental rights and assumes parents don’t have the wisdom to decide if their child is ready for schooling or not. Read more here.
SB 73: Lowering penalties on drug dealers: This bill will end mandatory minimum sentencing requirements for many drug offenses. This might be justified for non-violent drug possession charges, but lowering penalties for drug dealers is not justified, especially when they are selling substances like heroin and methamphetamine that kill people and destroy communities. This is part of Sen. Wiener’s plan to legalize all illicit drugs. Read more about his plans here.
SB 245: Forcing health insurance plans to pay for free abortions: This bill forces all private insurance policies to cover abortions with no co-pays and no deductibles, despite the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determination that California was already breaking federal law by forcing private health insurance plans to include coverage for abortion. There would be an exception for high deductible insurance plans. Read more here.
SB 357: Legalizes loitering for prostitution: This bill doesn’t legalize prostitution, but gets rid of a law that gives police the ability to deal with obvious prostitution happening on neighborhood streets. According to Los Angeles Sheriff Alex Villanueva, the “underlying root” of the “loitering with the intent to commit prostitution” law is to “target sex buyers who seek to exploit” women and men. This law will harm police efforts to prevent human trafficking from happening out in the open on any neighborhood street. The bill is sponsored by the ACLU and authored by Senator Scott Wiener, both proponents of legalizing prostitution. Read more here.
SB 363: Forces Boys State and Girls State to accept “non-binary” teens: This bill requires American Legion, who runs the Boys State conferences, and the American Legion Auxiliary, who runs the Girls State conferences, to only operate their civic engagement program for youth within the Capitol and with public school districts if both allow pupils, who do not identify as either male or female, to apply to either conference. State legislators shouldn’t be forcing private organizations to give up their beliefs about the biological nature of sex.
SB 380: Removing safeguards from assisted suicide law: California’s assisted suicide law passed in 2015 had some safeguarded added that the bill author, Senator Susan Eggman, now wants to remove. First, the bill’s sunset date of 2025 will be removed after only four years of published annual reports by the California Department of Public Health. The sunset date was put in the original bill to allow the legislature to reevaluate the law’s impact using a decade of data. Second, patients will no longer have to make two oral requests for suicide drugs with a 15-day waiting period between requests as is currently required. This safeguard was added to make sure patients weren’t making impulsive decisions or being subject to coercion of any kind. Read more bill details here.
SB 519: Decriminalization of LSD and other hallucinogenic drugs: This bill will legalize dangerous psychedelic drugs, such as LSD, Magic Mushrooms, and Ecstasy for those over 21. It would also eliminate laws against the cultivation, transfer, or transportation of these drugs and the paraphernalia used to take these drugs. Read more about the damaging effects of these drugs here and here.
SB 742: No picketing vaccination sites: This bill would, among other things, prohibit protest activities within 300 feet of a medical office or temporary location doing vaccinations. The U.S. Supreme Court has already struck down a Massachusetts law that created a 35 feet buffer zone around the entrance of an abortion clinic. Peaceful protests and sidewalk counseling in front of abortion clinics could be affected by SB 742, with abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood now distributing vaccinations.
May 26, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — From Genesis to Revelation, the Bible is filled with commandments that demonstrate the value God places on life. A few examples:
Man was created in the very image of God. (Genesis 1:27)
The strictest punishments are for those who take an innocent life. (Numbers 35:30-31)
The laws of purity are all about life. One becomes ritually impure if he comes in contact with a corpse. (Numbers 19:11) A woman is ritually impure during her menses. (Leviticus 15:19 — The means of sustaining a potential life is expelled. Plus, life is in the blood and it is being lost.)
Although the Sabbath is the holiest of all holy days in the Bible, the rabbis taught that saving a life was a valid reason for violating the Sabbath.
Jesus taught that even alleviating human suffering was a valid reason for violating the Sabbath. (Matthew 12:9-14)
There are those who say Romans 13:1-7 directs us to obey government authorities because they were put there by God. Generally, I agree.However, there are instances, both biblical and historical, where defying the government was not only allowed, but praised. Examples:
Moses’ mother hid him from Pharaoh, in violation of the law. (Exodus 2:2; Hebrews 11:23)
The Hebrew midwives violated the law, and then lied about it, in order to preserve the lives of the Israelite baby boys. (Exodus 1:17-20)
Rahab hid the spies and then lied to the authorities. (Joshua 2:1-6)
Many people violated Nazi law in order to save Jewish lives: the ten Boom family, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Oskar Schindler, Irene Sandler, to name only a few. I’m not saying we should be able to pick and choose which laws to obey, but when the law is clearly anti-life, we have a duty to push back.
Given God’s overwhelming affirmation of life, can Christians do anything less than value life and resist anything that compromises human life, in all its forms?
CDC, WHO, and U.S. government lied about the severity of COVID-19
The PCR test, used to diagnose COVID-19, was never intended to be used to diagnose an illness. In addition, the test has been run using 35+ cycles, which likely picks up harmless virus fragments. The New York Times suggests that as many as 90% of all positive COVID-19 tests are false positives.
Recent reports by the CDC indicate that the death toll of those who died of COVID-19, as opposed to dying with COVID-19, is far, far less than originally stated. The death count has been greatly exaggerated. These reports show that only 6% of all deaths associated with COVID-19 were actually attributable only to COVID-19. That comes to fewer than 10,000 deaths. The total death toll listed for COVID-19 (together with co-morbidities) is not much greater than the death toll from influenza in 2017 (~500K vs ~400K). And yet, we didn’t shut down for the flu
COVID-19 has a 99+% recovery rate for those under the age of 70
In addition, the death rates for 2020 have remained fairly consistent with the death rates from previous years, indicating that there was no pandemic at all.
As LifeSiteNews reported:
A recent research paper in the prestigious journal The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences points out these statistics, and then an even more surprising claim:
“The comparison is more striking when years of life lost (YLL) is the measure used. Goldstein and Lee (11) estimate that the mean loss of life years for a person dying from COVID-19 in the United States is 11.7 y. Multiplying 377,000 decedents by 11.7 y lost per decedent gives a total of 4.41 M years of life lost to COVID-19 in 2020, only a third of the 13.02 million life years lost to excess mortality in the United States in 2017 (Table 1). The reason that the comparison is so much sharper for YLL than for excess deaths is that COVID-19 deaths in 2020 occurred at much older ages, on average, than the excess deaths of 2017.”
If COVID-19 is not nearly as widespread or dangerous as we have been led to believe, there is no reason for life-restricting mandates.
Domestic abuse, drug abuse, and suicides skyrocketed during lockdowns
This CDC report is just a snapshot of these effects:
During June 24–30, 2020, U.S. adults reported considerably elevated adverse mental health conditions associated with COVID-19. Younger adults, racial/ethnic minorities, essential workers, and unpaid adult caregivers reported having experienced disproportionately worse mental health outcomes, increased substance use, and elevated suicidal ideation.
Surely we can all agree that domestic abuse, drug abuse, and suicidal thoughts are not life-giving.
Mask-wearing is unhealthy and has the potential for great harm and loss of life
First of all, masks don’t stop viruses. Any virus. It even says so on the box of blue masks you pick up at Target.
Secondly, they’re harming people. They increase CO2 levels and decrease oxygen intake. A comment on this website stated:
I am President of a Manufacturing Company in Saskatchewan, Canada. Under Saskatchewan Occupational Health & Safety Rules it is illegal for me to expose any of my Employees to a Hazardous Environment, above 1,500 ppm CO2 levels (Atmospheric is 375 to 400 ppm), or below 19.5% Oxygen levels (Atmospheric Oxygen is 20.9%). OSHA Safety Officers have measured Oxygen levels at 17.4% behind an N95 mask with an IBRID 6 Gas Monitor. Del Bigtree, Medical Research Journalist measured CO2 levels between 8,000 to 10,000 ppm behind a cloth mask and over 10,000 ppm behind an N95 mask which is Hazardous Environment!
If masks do, indeed, restrict oxygen and increase CO2, there may be other unintended consequences. Miscarriages and stillbirths rose over 300% during a six-week period in early 2021. Obstetricians also report smaller umbilical cords, which indicates that the pre-born baby isn’t getting all the oxygen (via the placenta) that he/she should have.
Both emotional and physical health is being harmed by the use of masks. Clearly, these are not in the interest of life.
The shots have been proven to cause serious adverse reactions, including death
MRNA shots are considered “vaccines” only because the definition of “vaccine” has changed in recent months to include mRNA injections.
First, a little background on the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS): It was established in 1990 to keep track of all vaccine adverse events, and now includes those from the COVID-19 shots. A Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Inc. study indicated that only 1% of all vaccine adverse events are reported to VAERS.
According to VAERS, COVID-19 shots from all manufacturers combined have resulted in over 180,000 adverse events, including over 4,000 deaths. If, as the Harvard study indicates, this is only 1% of all adverse events and deaths, we’re looking at a horrendous loss of life and health. Even if, due to more awareness about vaccine adverse events, that number is 10%, it still amounts to almost 2 million adverse events and 40,000 deaths. Compare that to the polio vaccine in the 1950s that was pulled after 5 deaths. The flu vaccine in the 1970s that was pulled after 53 deaths. And Tylenol was pulled from shelves after seven deaths.
The “vaccines” have been given FDA approval under Emergency Use Authorization. This, in itself, is problematic. The law states that EUA can only be allowed if there are no treatments for a given illness. But in the case of COVID-19, there are.
There are effective treatments for COVID-19
Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have been demonstrated to be only two of several treatments for COVID-19. They have both been used for decades and are considered extremely safe. They have been used off-label to successfully treat COVID-19, either alone or in combination with other supplements and antibiotics. On top of that, they’re inexpensive.
All COVID-19 shots are connected to the abortion industry
By far my biggest reason to refuse these horrid jabs is that they are all connected with the abortion industry. This is indisputably anti-life.
LifeSite’s John-Henry Westen shares some clips of Stanley Plotkin’s 9-hour testimony before the U.S. Senate. Plotkin reluctantly admitted that over 70 babies’ corpses were used in the process of finding the two cell lines that would be used in a number of vaccines. Some people say that since these cell lines, obtained in the 1970s, are so distantly connected to abortion as to be untainted, it’s okay to get the vaccines. But the fact is that new cell lines are being developed all the time, because cell lines die out eventually and there aren’t enough of them for all the research “scientists” want to do.
Pamela Acker is a biologist and researcher who explains the horrors of the abortions done to obtain material for medical research — including researching, testing, and manufacturing vaccines. These innocent children are delivered via Caesarian section. Their tissues are harvested from them while they are still alive and without benefit of anesthesia, since that would damage the usefulness of the tissues. WI-38, MRC-5, HEK-293, PER C-6 are some of the cell lines that are currently used in the manufacture of various vaccines.
The Johnson & Johnson injection contains DNA fragments from aborted babies. The Moderna and Pfizer injections were tested on aborted fetal tissue. They are all created at the expense of an innocent child. I cannot and will not be a party to such barbarism.
In the very beginning of the “COVID crisis,” I kept saying that the numbers didn’t add up. Either things were much worse than we were led to believe, or they weren’t nearly as bad. Lockdowns, followed by mask mandates, followed by talk of vaccine mandates, convinced me that COVID-19 was not as serious as the government pretended, but that the response was going to be much worse. I was proven right. I don’t know why there is so much pressure for everyone to receive the jab: rewards, threats, coercion. Why do all of that if the jab is truly safe and effective? In fact, if it’s effective, then why worry about those who don’t get it?
And I guess that’s my big question. Why? The possible answers scare me, and they should scare every thinking person on the planet.
Psychiatrist urges people not to live in fear of COVID: ‘If you are afraid you will be very easy to control’
May 24, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – A leading Swedish psychiatrist has said that daily media reports on COVID-19 have caused the general population to live in an unhealthy cycle of fear and panic.
In a TEDx Talk, David Eberhard, psychiatrist and head of staff at Prima Maria Addiction Care Clinic in Stockholm, has urged people around the world not to live in fear of a virus with a negligible mortality rate.
Despite the fact that the virus is not particularly dangerous for the majority of people, according to Eberhard the media’s daily reporting of COVID-19 deaths for over a year has led ordinary people to believe that if anyone contracts the virus “they will most certainly die.”
According to Eberhard, being mortal, death is part of the natural cycle of life. However, the risk of dying is not usually broadcast over television on a daily basis. This emphasis on death is causing the population to believe that “everything is out of control,” which will lead them to overestimating the risks of the virus.
“If you provide numbers of deaths each day,” Eberhard said, “it will create panic, and this is exactly what has happened.” This has caused governments to implement stringent lockdowns and curfews, with Eberhard noting that “the longer the pandemic has lasted, the more draconic measures governments have been taking.”
Some attribute the actions of governments around the world to the Dunning-Kruger effect, which is when ignorant people overestimate their competence and therefore make mistakes. However, since many highly educated people are “contributing to the panic,” Eberhard argues that the current situation cannot be completely attributed to this effect.
Instead, he says that the situation reminds him of the essay, “The Basic Laws of Stupid People,” written by an Italian economic historian, Carlo Chipola. Chipola explained that the amount of stupid people is not relational to their education level nor their intelligence as defined by IQ.
Instead, the defining factor is when “their actions lead to bad outcomes” for both themselves and for others.
“Overestimating the dangers of an infection with a mortality rate of around 0.2 % and at the same time, ignoring massive negative effects of their actions cannot be described in a better way,” Eberhard added.
For a year, children have not been going to school, businesses have been suffering, and the mental side effects are only just beginning to be known.
Eberhard explained that many countries are suffering from “National Panic Syndrome.” This “leads to people being too scared to die. At the same time, it makes the population less ready and capable of handling real danger.”
Citizens living in countries suffering from National Panic Syndrome, Eberhard said, will often develop “security junkie syndrome.” This is when a person seeks more safety, but then feels more insecure despite living in the “safest circumstances in history.”
“The safer you get,” he explains, “the more things seem frightening since the real dangers are well taken care of. For every real danger you get rid of, there will be at least 10 nearly dangerous things that will be upgraded to become real dangers. So, the effect is that there will be more and more things to be afraid of.”
This leads to perpetually living in fear and then becoming lazier. “If you are afraid, you will be very easy to control, which is what we have seen during the pandemic.”
However, Eberhard explains that this is completely psychological. “We all need to stop acting risk-averse and instead, in a rational way, start to challenge our fears,” he said. “The probability that you die of an infection that has a mortality rate of around 0.2 percent is negligible.”
“Whatever you do, remember that life is not about living the longest, but the best. If you live in fear and isolation, there is no point in living,” Eberhard continued.
“Don’t lock yourself in and don’t let others do it to you. Try to live a good life in the relatively short time you have.”
Latest CDC data show reports of adverse events after COVID vaccines surpass 200,000
May 25, 2021 (Children’s Health Defense) — The number of reported adverse events following COVID vaccines surpassed 200,000 according to data released last Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The data comes directly from reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.
Every Friday, VAERS makes public all vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date, usually about a week prior to the release date. Friday’s data show that between Dec. 14, 2020 and May 14, a total of 227,805 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 4,201 deaths — an increase of 144 over the previous week — and 18,528 serious injuries, up 1,338.
This week’s data showed 943 total adverse events, including 23 rated as serious, among 12- to -17-year-olds.
In the U.S., 268.4 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of May 14. This includes 115 million doses of Moderna’s vaccine, 144 million doses of Pfizer and 9 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson (J&J) COVID vaccine.
Of the 4,201 deaths reported as of May 14, 23% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination, 16% occurred within 24 hours and 38% occurred in people who became ill within 48 hours of being vaccinated.
This week’s VAERS data show:
20% of deaths were related to cardiac disorders.
54% of those who died were male, 44% were female and the remaining death reports did not include gender of the deceased.
The average age of death was 74.7 and the youngest deaths reported include two 15-year-olds (VAERS I.D. 1187918 and 1242573 ) and a 16-year-old (VAERS I.D. 1225942). There were other reported deaths in children under 16 that could not be confirmed or contained obvious errors.
As of May 14, 1,140 pregnant women reported adverse events related to COVID vaccines, including 351 reports of miscarriage or premature birth.
Of the 2,275 cases of Bell’s Palsy reported, 51% were reported after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccinations, 42% following vaccination with the Moderna vaccine and 192 cases, or 10%, of Bell’s Palsy cases were reported in conjunction with J&J.
There were 195 reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome with 40% of cases attributed to Pfizer, 38% to Moderna and 26% to J&J.
There were 65,854 reports of anaphylaxis with 38% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine, 51% to Moderna and 11% to J&J.
There were 3,758 reports of clotting disorders and other related conditions. Of those, 1,468 reports were attributed to Pfizer, 1,093 reports to Moderna and 1,093 reports to J&J.
COVID vaccines may not work for millions with underlying conditions. As The Defender reported May 19, some experts are questioning the CDC’s recommendation that immunocompromised people get vaccinated after new research showed 15% to 80% of people with underlying health disorders and those on immunosuppressive medications mount few, if any, antibodies to COVID vaccines.
Yet, current CDC guidelines indicate those with compromised immune systems should be vaccinated for COVID even though “no data are available to establish COVID vaccine safety and efficacy in these groups” as people with compromised immune systems or those who take immunosuppressants for a medical condition were largely excluded from vaccine clinical trials.
Fourth-grader rips school mask mandate and school board later votes to stop enforcing masks
May 24, 2021 (LifeSiteNews)(Excerpt) Mounting data show mask mandates for school children to have no credible scientific basis. A major, randomized study published in November by the esteemed Annals of Internal Medicine found no statistically significant difference in COVID-19 cases between mask-wearers and non-mask-wearers.
Another study, aimed more specifically toward children, discovered that masks were causing children health problems on physical, psychological, and behavioral fronts. The researchers found that, among the almost 26,000 children included in the study, 60 percent reported feeling irritable, 53 percent had headaches, 50 percent were less happy, and 37 percent suffered fatigue and other ailments, including shortness of breath and dizziness.
Be suspicious of everything that the WEF says. They are a group of filthy rich globalists who work on a world-wide scale to remold the fabric and constraints of our lives according to their desires and image. They meet each year in secret in Davos, and there they decide what kind of crisis to implement next to further their agendas of “The Great Reset”, “One World Government”, “Sustainable Development”, “Depopulation”, “Socialism/Communism”, “Equity” (which means the masses are ruled according to the lowest common denominator and incomes are at poverty level so that the government can swoop in and, at the begging of the mindless masses, “save” us with handouts, all with strings attached), “Encouragement of amoral behavior” (The sexualization of the young, including preschoolers, which is already happening in some schools, where they teach 4 year olds how to masturbate and encourage them to explore their sexuality with, well, anyone or anything), and “Elimination of the 1st and 2nd Amendments” (The criminalization of all speech not in keeping with the government approved narrative and confiscation of all privately-owned guns and accessories).
DONE – Place obedient drones in power by any means possible
ALMOST FINISHED – Covid-19 Plan-Demic, followed by threats of the loss of even more of our freedoms if we do not obey…and most persons will out of cowardice and false hope.
NEXT-UP – Cyber attacks affecting internet availability, banking, and medical care, followed by user-restricting regulations to eliminate privacy and reduce access to our financial assets – and possible confiscation of assets of the “disobedient” – and the removal of all alternate news/media platforms from use.
The stated goals and yearly reports on the website indicate their freedom-crushing, evil plans.
Frontline Doctors File Motion to Stop FDA Authorization of COVID ‘Vaccines’ for Children
May 21, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A group of parents, along with America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) and written by Thomas Renz, Esq., filed a motion in federal court seeking a temporary restraining order “to prevent the expansion of the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for COVID-19 vaccines to include children under the age of 16,” according a statement released earlier today.
The motion was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama and is directed against Secretary Xavier Becerra and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). It consists of numerous plaintiffs representing various interests and backgrounds, including “physicians and the parents of minor children who are alarmed about offering children experimental products that have not undergone long term animal or safety studies.”
“We’ve never seen this level of side effects for any vaccine without the FDA taking action,” stated Dr. Angelina Farella, AFLDS Pediatric Medical Director. “The Rotavirus vaccine was pulled for 15 cases of non-lethal side effects and the Swine Flu vaccine was pulled for 25 deaths. But now, by the CDC’s own data, we are seeing a 12,000 percent increase in deaths with these vaccines and they’re still talking about giving this to our kids.”
“Our children should never be the experiment,” she continued. “No additional authorizations or mandates should be granted. We want to preserve the previously established safety standards.”
Dr. Farella also cited statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which confirms “children are at statistically zero risk for COVID-19, making expansion of the EUA for younger children medically unnecessary.”
The plaintiffs thus argue that “the defendants can make no science-based argument that preserving the status quo will create any hardship for them or for the public.”
As a matter of law, the petitioners contend that “the statistics alone make it impossible for the government to satisfy the balancing test required by federal statute (§ 360bbb–3(c)(2)(B)) as a condition to issuing EUAs for these experimental vaccines.”
As the motion itself reads, “EUA requires that an intervention address a serious or life-threatening condition, and for known and potential benefits of the intervention to be balanced against the known and potential harms.” Yet, the plaintiffs assert, “[t]here is not even a pretense of a factual basis that COVID-19 represents a serious or life-threatening condition for children under 16, since the CDC acknowledges they face 0% risk of mortality from COVID-19 statistically.”
Therefore, according to attorney Lowell H. Becraft, Jr., “[t]here is no public interest in subjecting children to an inoculation program, in order to protect them from a disease that simply does not threaten them.” Further, “since the DHHS Secretary has failed to make even the minimum statutory disclosures regarding risks and alternative treatments,” informed consent is not even possible for parents, while children are inherently incapable of such consent.
Statistics included by the plaintiffs to support their arguments include the following:
Under the age of 20, the survivability rate for COVID-19 is 99.997 percent. More than 4,000 deaths that have been tied to the administering of COVID-19 vaccines in the last four months, as opposed to 1,500 total in the previous ten years for all vaccines.
Prior experimental vaccine rollout was stopped by the government when there were 25 unexplained deaths (deemed too high).
Researchers are concerned that spike proteins from the vaccines cause disease even without the virus, cross the blood-brain barrier, and could increase auto-immune disorders.
“I’ve done my research and know that there is essentially zero percent risk for young people dying of COVID-19 and fiercely oppose the use of an untested product that has not been fully approved for use in healthy children,” said plaintiff Matt Schweder, a parent of minor children.
“I am very concerned about the way the EUAs have been handled and I don’t believe particularly young people should be pressured by the government to start taking a vaccine like this where there are so many unknowns,” he concluded.
The plaintiffs affirm in the motion that their arguments will make clear to the court, “based on the law and well-founded scientific evidence, that:
the EUAs should never have been granted, the EUAs should be revoked immediately, the injections are dangerous biological agents that have the potential to cause substantially greater harm than the COVID-19 disease itself, and numerous laws have been broken in the process of granting these EUAs and pushing these injections on the American people.”
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
— Martin Niemöller
CDC Cited Misleading Stats to Force Americans to Needlessly Wear Masks Outdoors
WASHINGTON, D.C., May 13, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — The U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) has been caught citing misleading stats in order to justify forcing Americans to wear masks outdoors, where the risk of contracting COVID-19 is near zero.
The CDC long maintained that there is about a 10 percent chance of COVID-19 transmission when the actual number is likely anywhere from one percent to less than 1/10th of a percent, according to multiple experts. That means the CDC has inflated the possible risk — and the fears of Americans who rely on information and recommendations supplied by the government organization — up to 100 times higher than actually warranted.
The number “seems to be a huge exaggeration,” according to University of St. Andrews virologist Dr. Muge Cevik in a statement to The New York Times (NYT), which broke the story.
“Saying that less than 10 percent of Covid transmission occurs outdoors is akin to saying that sharks attack fewer than 20,000 swimmers a year. (The actual worldwide number is around 150.) It’s both true and deceiving,” averred the NYT report.
In fact, “there is not a single documented Covid infection anywhere in the world from casual outdoor interactions, such as walking past someone on a street or eating at a nearby table,” NYT reporter David Leonhardt wrote. Further, much of the data comes from cases at buildings such as schools and construction sites in Singapore that were eventually and inaccurately classified as outdoor transmissions.
By uncovering the CDC’s exaggerated stats, the leftist NYT has conducted the same sort of truthful reporting that led YouTube to permanently deplatform LifeSiteNews in February.
“NYT report violates YouTube’s Covid-19 misinformation policy,” noted the Wall Street Journal’s Jason Willick in a tweet, “which prohibits ‘content that contradicts WHO or local health authorities’ guidance” including on “transmission” and “social distancing and self-isolation guidelines.”
NYT report violates YouTube’s Covid-19 misinformation policy, which prohibits “content that contradicts WHO or local health authorities’ guidance” including on “transmission” and “social distancing and self-isolation guidelines.” Jason Willick (@jawillick) May 11, 2021
The CDC’s unself-conscious campaign of fear has had a huge impact on vast segments of the U.S. population.
Pollsters at the Morning Consult found that people who received the COVID-19 vaccine are more afraid of returning to normal life than those who have not been vaccinated. The following chart, published by Fox News, displays the stunning level of fear still experienced by the vaccinated:
“What does this tell us?” asked Tucker Carlson on his Fox News show. “Among other things, it tells us that we’ve long ago left the realm of science, and are instead in a state of mass hysteria and mass manipulation.”
In the segment below on Monday’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson said, “there are unresolved concerns” about the long-term health effects of COVID vaccines, including on female fertility and pregnant women.
The American people should not be forced to take a one-size-fits-all medical treatment, Carlson explained. “No medicine is designed for every person in all circumstances,” he said.
Last month, the Biden administration said the federal government will not require all Americans to get the COVID vaccine, nor will it require vaccination passports. But the truth is, when it comes to COVID vaccines, President Biden is not pro-choice, he’s pro-mandate, Carlson said.
“The question of whether to take them, whether to have powerful drugs injected into your body is the most intimate kind of personal health decision. Politicians and bureaucrats should have no role in a decision like that.”
But just because there’s no federal mandate to get the COVID vaccine doesn’t mean you or your family won’t be required to get it, Carlson explained. With support from the Biden administration, “private industry and nonprofits may be forcing you to,” he added.
Carlson noted that colleges and universities are requiring COVID vaccinations in some form, including the entire University of California system, the largest in the country.
Based on what we know about COVID and its effect on young people, Carlson said it doesn’t make sense to require them to get the vaccine — yet nobody is asking why college students need the vaccine.
“Why would we immunize people against a virus for which they already have antibodies?” Carlson asked. On top of that, he reminded viewers, no coronavirus vaccines have been fully licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
“From a medical standpoint, it’s hard to understand the reasoning behind this. As a group, young people are not at risk of dying from COVID. Huge numbers of college students have already been infected with the coronavirus and therefore have natural immunity to it.”
Media censored COVID-19 early treatment options that could have reduced fatalities by 85%
(Excerpt) April 8, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) Addressing the broad “misinformation” of asymptomatictransfer of COVID-19, which has supported the need for lockdowns due to the notion that the virus can be unintentionally spread by infectious, asymptomatic people, the medical professor said, “One of the mistakes I heard today as a rationale for vaccination is asymptomatic spread. And I want to be very clear about this: My opinion is there is a low degree, if any, of asymptomatic spread. Sick person gives it to sick person. The Chinese have published a study … [of] 11 million people. They tried to find [evidence of] asymptomatic spread. You can’t find it. And that’s been, you know, one of important pieces of misinformation.”
Eyes On Arizona… Election Audit At “Madhouse” Captures National Attention On Accuracy Of 2020 Results
May 5, 2021 (The Wanderer) Like marks on ballots themselves when they’re recounted or audited after an election, the meaning of “the Madhouse on McDowell” could be understood in more than one way.
The big “madhouse” arena at the Arizona State Fairgrounds on West McDowell Road here originally meant a place of crazy excitement when the Phoenix Suns Major League Basketball team made Veterans Memorial Coliseum their home from the late 1960s through the early 1990s.
The Suns were growing Phoenix’s first major-league sports team and gave some rabid fans an object for their affections other than the various well-established, formidable Sun Devils teams at Arizona State University, in suburban Tempe. Major-league football, baseball, and hockey arrived here later.
But a “madhouse” also might indicate a focus of boiling anger, which has turned out to be the way certain mad media view the audit being conducted of the 2.1 million November 2020 ballots in Maricopa County, which has Phoenix as county seat.
Maricopa is by far the most populous of the state’s counties, most of them large in area but rural in population. Although Arizona is the sixth-largest state in square miles, it has only 15 counties.
Media, often having a leftist slant, resolved that Democrat radical Joe Biden’s supposed presidential victory here in 2020 should be left alone rather than be more closely examined in the audit sought by the Grand Canyon State’s Republican-majority Senate.
May 3, 2021 (Rod Pelletier)A propaganda behemoth — the amalgamation of big government, Big Tech and big media — is crushing Americans’ freedoms, especially the freedom of speech.
The White House issued a statement Monday in commemoration of World Press Freedom Day but it’s little more than propaganda.
It preaches “At a time when the truth is increasingly under attack, our need for accurate, fact-based reporting, open public conversation, and accountability has never been greater.”
“Journalists,” the statement continues, “uncover the truth, check the abuse of power, and demand transparency from those in power. They are indispensable to the functioning of democracy.”
This comes from the most left-leaning, pro-Marxist presidential administration in American history. The same administration seeks to indoctrinate young people with so-called LGBT ideology, which labels the holocaust of infanticide a human right and uses racial strife as a weapon to suppress conservatives.
Most people working for big media consider themselves journalists. They are, in fact, nothing more than Marxist activists who use their position in media to tirelessly instill demonic doctrines into the minds of Americans.
While they do this, good journalists are facing the lash of cancel culture. In April, investigative journalist James O’Keefe and his organization, Project Veritas, were permanently banned from Twitter.
His great sin? He released an undercover video revealing cable news giant CNN intentionally airs propaganda. In the video, technical director, Charlie Chester tells an undercover journalist, “Our focus was to get Trump out of office.” Later in the video, Chester admits, “I came to CNN because I wanted to be part of that.”
Project Veritas’ second undercover video in the same series shows Chester admitting, “I think there’s an art to manipulation. … Inflection, saying things twice — there’s little subtleties to how to manipulate people. … I mean, it’s enough to change the world, you know?”
While Twitter isn’t the be-all and end-all of social media, it is a barometer for how not only conservatives but also journalists doing actual journalism are being silenced and sidelined.
But only after the first video was released, social media giant Twitter permanently banned O’Keefe and Project Veritas from its platform, claiming O’Keefe “operated fake accounts.”
While Twitter isn’t the be-all and end-all of social media, it is a barometer for how not only conservatives but also journalists doing actual journalism are being silenced and sidelined.
Whether it’s the white farmer genocide going on in South Africa, complications spinning out of the China virus, or the wedding of big government to big media all being exposed, the truth must be told. But don’t count on it coming from either the White House or from big media.
I always knew that the mainstream media was biased, but I never realized how evil they are. Lying, smearing, punishing and cancelling are their M.O. when it comes to getting what they want. If you get your “news” from CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, etc., you are not only not getting the whole picture, but the picture that you are getting has been edited to advance their agenda and soften the blow of the elimination of all of our God-given human rights, no matter how basic.
Say “NO” to lockdowns, masks, distancing and number-of-people limitations – they are not meant to protect us, but to control us, and how easily we have let them become our masters. None of these abuses will stop until WE stop them by refusing to obey these unjust mandates, calling out the lies and becoming informed. I believe that civil disobedience is more than justified, immediately.
A certain segment of society can loot, burn, riot, and kill with impunity, but we can’t decide for ourselves whether or not to wear a mask, how many people to have visit us, how close we can be to our loved ones or where we can go??? Your new mantra: “MY BODY, MY CHOICE”, when it comes to masks and vaccines! Accept the fact that they do not care whether or not we live or die, only that their power increases.
They will not relinquish that power; it must be denied them!
It’s not about our health!!!
There is NO health decisions freedom amendment to the Constitution. Do you think politicians will not take advantage of that loophole? Fear is their greatest weapon. Trust Christ, not the government!
Fully referenced facts about covid-19, provided by experts in the field, to help readers make a realistic risk assessment.
“The only means to fight the plague is honesty.” (Albert Camus, 1947)
Lethality: According to the latest immunological studies, the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) of covid-19 in the general population is about 0.1% to 0.5% in most countries, which is most closely comparable to the medium influenza pandemics of 1936, 1957 and 1968.
Treatment: For people at high risk or high exposure, early or prophylactic treatment is essential to prevent progression of the disease. According to numerous international studies, early outpatient treatment of Covid may reduce hospitalizations and deaths by about 75%.
Age profile: The median age of Covid deaths is over 80 years in most Western countries (78 in the US) and about 5% of the deceased had no serious preconditions. The age and risk profile of Covid mortality is therefore comparable to normal mortality, but increases it proportionally.
Antibodies: By the end of 2020, antibody seroprevalence was between 10% and 30% of the population in most Western countries. At seroprevalence levels above 30%, a significant decrease in the infection rate was observed in many regions.
Symptoms: Up to 40% of all infected persons show no symptoms. Overall, about 95% of all people develop at most mild or moderate symptoms and do not require hospitalization. Early outpatient treatment may significantly reduce hospitalizations.
Transmission: According to current knowledge, the main routes of transmission of the virus are indoor aerosols and droplets produced when speaking or coughing, while outdoor aerosols as well as most object surfaces appear to play a minor role. The coronavirus season in the northern hemisphere lasts from about November to April.
Children and schools: In contrast to influenza, the risk of disease and transmission in children is rather low in the case of Covid. There was and is therefore no medical reason for the closure of elementary schools or other measures specifically aimed at children.
Virus mutations: Similar to influenza viruses, mutations occur frequently in coronaviruses. Most of these mutations are insignificant, but some of them may increase the transmissibility, virulence or immune evasion of the virus to some extent.
Virus origin: The origin of the new coronavirus remains unknown, but the best evidence currently points to a Covid-like pneumonia incident in a Chinese mine in 2012, whose virus samples were collected, stored and researched by the Virology Institute in Wuhan (WIV).
Surveillance: NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden warned that the coronavirus pandemic may be used to expand global surveillance. Many governments have restricted fundamental rights of their citizens and announced plans to introduce digital biometric vaccine passports.
Vaccine passports are the gateway to the most radical slavery the world has ever seen What is needed in the meantime is urgently to unwind the cycle of compliance
April 15, 2021 (The Conservative Woman) – In the early stages of the ongoing ‘war on terror’, which started twenty years ago, a nebulous conception of the enemy, non-existent victory conditions and the consistent dishonesty of warmongering politicians such as Blair led some to wonder if the threat of the global ‘Axis of Evil’ had been exaggerated to achieve some other set of goals.
Today, in similar circumstances of unanswered questions and ambiguous realities underpinned by systematic deception, reinforced by Boris Johnson on Monday as he launched the new phase of the psychological and economic war he is waging on the British people – vaccine passports (and after that?) – this question is being asked:
Is there a pandemic? Was there ever a pandemic?
Perhaps the most important point to grasp is that a pandemic is a construct, not an object. There is nothing you can point at which is the pandemic, only various data points indicating that one exists.
The World Health Organization changed its definition in 2008 to exclude the criterion of ‘enormous numbers of deaths and illness’. In other words, the definition of a pandemic is ultimately a matter of interpretation. There is no data that currently supports the claim there is a pandemic in Britain at this moment, and whether any data ever did is doubtful.
California! Who Needs It?Beware of Your High Schooler’s “Ethnic Studies”Class
April 15, 2021 (The Wanderer) Ahhh, California. A place where Americans used to look to for innovation, culture, and that yearning to live and breathe free. Its air was clean and its beauty and climate were a magnet for the rest of the country. We used to sing about “California Girls” and “Cable Cars” as if they were national treasures, and its agriculture was celebrated as coming from “the land of fruit and nuts.”
Well, it’s still the land of fruit and nuts,but not the agricultural kind. The political kind. The California legislature is full of it, fruits and nuts, that is. They have considered and adopted more than their fair share of crazy ideas that they seriously consider in the mainstream.
Who, for example, can forget that enlightened piece of legislation that eliminated boys’ and girls’ toy departments from stores? Yes, every Californian should be able to differentiate between a Barbie Doll and a toy truck when choosing a birthday gift for their little non-binary bundle of joy. What a wonderful piece of legislative forethought that would only confuse us poor, uneducated bumpkins in the Midwest who still need the assistance of sex-designated departments to aid our decision process.
My guess is that it will take a while for my legislature to adopt such an inspired piece of legislation. I don’t think Iowans’ wokeness is as developed as theirs is. Anyway, that stellar political leadership has now introduced another piece of fruity lawmaking that will enshrine the state’s reputation. It seems now they are proposing to make — as a condition of high school graduation — their version of ethnic studies. Now that may not sound too bad at first blush, but as they say, the devil is in the details.
The legislature directed the California Department of Education (CDE) to develop a model curriculum on ethnic studies that local schools could use. That curriculum includes teachers leading chants to Aztec gods of human sacrifice. Yes, California is setting the stage for their children (binary, non-binary, or just plain confused) to learn how to chant praises to these gods — of course, God forbid the school choir sing O Holy Night for the school’s winter solstice pageant — but chanting praises for Quetzalcoatl (ket-zolÈkooah-tl) or Tezcatlipoca, (tez-ca-tlee-poh’-kawell), that’s just fine for the Golden State.
So what would these chants sound like? According to the Pacific Justice Institute, there are at least five distinct deities for whom chants have been approved by the CDE. Here is one of the jotty tunes your little one will be singing himself to sleep with:
April 14, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) As part of a recent fiery interview given by liberal author Naomi Wolf to conservative radio show host Eric Metaxas, Wolf slammed the globalist, billionaire Bill Gates for his role in steering the global political situation into a medical tyranny.
Naming Gates as part of a “hellish amalgamation” alongside the World Economic Forum and China, she claimed the threefold alliance was issuing a “directive” to governments across the world, in order to enforce restrictive lockdowns and promote a “bio-security state in which the freedoms and liberties of the West will be suspended.”
Whilst Western media, governments and corporations widely hail Bill Gates as a benevolent donor and world influencer, Wolf suggested that there was a more sinister aspect to the wide-reaching influence he enjoys.
As censorship of conservative voices has grown exponentially in recent months, Wolf linked Gates to the uniform reporting seen in the global media with regard to topics such as COVID-19, Joe Biden and COVID injections.
Mentioning the mainstream media reporting on issues relating to COVID specifically, Wolf noted how “we know that deaths are being inflated…there’s a 40% inflation in just one state,” referring also to the PCR COVID tests, which have been widely decried as completely unreliable.
“When there’s a real pandemic it doesn’t need PR,” she continued. “There are false narratives at different inflection points in the whole house of cards.”
Such relentless media coverage which ignores the facts, Wolf attributed largely to Gates: “Unfortunately the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation funds our major media. The NewYork Times got millions in funding; the Guardian got millions in funding; the CDC foundation gets $12-17 million a year from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; the Telegraph gets millions, NPR gets millions.”
Nor are such claims Wolf’s own, as she revealed that an August 2020 article in the Columbia Journalism Review documented the financial support which Gates was providing to the major news corporations across the globe.
Upon her own investigation into the Gates Foundation financial records, Wolf discovered substantial financing not only of “media, media, media,” but also “K through 12 education.”
March 10, 2021 (Mercola) — In 1962, in a now infamous experiment, Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram tested the limits of human obedience to authority. The study administrator instructed the study subjects — the “teachers” — to give electric shocks to a student.
The “student” was actually an actor, but the study subjects were unaware of this, and complied with the demands to shock him whenever he gave an incorrect response to a question. Even as the student moaned, begged for the shocks to stop and ultimately stopped responding, the subjects obeyed the authority figure in the room and issued painful electric shocks.
The subjects were clearly uncomfortable with the task at times, but still continued, showing that people may carry out heinous acts when ordered to do so by authorities because they feel less responsible for the behavior in this capacity.
With societal norms rapidly changing, and an increasingly authoritative environment emerging, it raises the question of whether or not the public will continue to blindly obey criminal authoritarians, no matter the consequences.
‘An order is an order’
The Milgram experiment was conducted following the trial of Nazi Adolf Eichmann, who used the Nuremberg defense, or “befehl ist befehl,” which translates to “an order is an order.” The Milgram experiment clearly showed that people would act against their own judgment and harm another person to extreme lengths simply because they were told to do so.
The subjects first experienced a 45-volt shock themselves — so they would know what it felt like — then administered the shocks in increasing intervals. They were labeled from 15 to 450 volts — from slight shock all the way up to “extreme intensity shock,” “danger: severe shock,” and the strongest voltage, XXX.”
Reflections by Dr Knut Wittkows —The Never-ending Lockdowns
March 31, 2021 (Alliance for Natural Health) Why do governments persist with lockdowns, or the threat of lockdowns, given a growing body of evidence showing that lockdowns don’t save lives? Will lockdowns that were meant to only ‘flatten the curve’ now be sidelined because Covid vaccines are considered the panacea?
This week on Speaking Naturally, we interview Dr Knut Wittkowski. He is an eminent scientist with a long track record as a biostatistician and epidemiologist. He was one of the earliest to call out the folly of lockdowns. His main recommendations to shield or treat early the most vulnerable, while letting the infection run its normal course through healthy populations – stated as early as March 2020 – subsequently became the basis of the Great Barrington Declaration.
EID Journal, ISSN: 1080-6059Volume 26, Number 5, May 2020
Non-pharmaceutical Measures forPandemic Influenza in Non-healthcare Settings:Personal Protective and Environmental Measures
There were 3 influenza pandemics in the 20th century, and there has been 1 so far in the 21st century. Local, national, and international health authorities regularly update their plans for mitigating the next influenza pandemic in light of the latest available evidence on the effectiveness of various control measures in reducing transmission.
Here, we review the evidence base on the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical personal protective measures and environmental hygiene measures in non-healthcare settings and discuss their potential inclusion in pandemic plans.
Although mechanistic studies support the potential effect of hand hygiene or face masks, evidence from 14 randomized controlled trials of these measures did not support a substantial effect on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza. We similarly found limited evidence on the effectiveness of improved hygiene and environmental cleaning. We identified several major knowledge gaps requiring further research, most fundamentally an improved characterization of the modes of person-to-person transmission.
April 6, 2021 (Church Militant) It’s becoming more and more obvious that leftists are working from a rulebook… In [Saul Alinsky’s] 1971 book, Rules for Radicals — which he dedicated to Lucifer — he outlined 13 rules for [Marxist] activists to follow:
Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have
Never go outside the expertise of your people
Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy
Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules
Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon
A good tactic is one your people enjoy
A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag
Keep the pressure on; never let up
The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself
The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition
If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive
The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative
Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it
These rules are important because Antifa, BLM and other leftist activists have been employing these tactics in Democrat-run cities across the country. Portland, Oregon has seen nonstop violence employed against citizens, police officers and federal officers.
But notice that if people on the political Right engage in an isolated incident of rioting — like the unrest at Capitol Hill on January 6 — suddenly, the Left calls it “sedition” and “rebellion” against the government and demands those responsible be punished to the fullest extent of the law.
Leftists are pro-police, pro-lethal force and pro-wall — but only when it suits them and their agenda.
April 4, 2021 (American Thinker) There is only one way to end the endless mask mandates, and that is to just stop wearing them. President Biden asked for 100 days of masking. All right; As of May 1, he’ll have had his 100 days. On that day I propose that we all remove our masks and keep them off. It is time the American people let their rulers know they will no longer tolerate arbitrary and useless mandates that seem to be more about controlling them with fear than protecting them from disease. The goalposts have been moved for the last time.
And May 1 is an especially appropriate date for the great unmasking. May Day is the traditional international socialist holiday, and the pandemic has been used as an excuse to deprive us of our freedoms and advance the socialist agenda (e.g., see the recently-passed $1.9 trillion “covid relief” package in which only 9% went for covid-related items). What better day to stand up to these would-be Stalins?
So, tell all your friends. Get the message out on social media. Be polite and respectful of others and don’t violate their personal space, but be firm in asserting your rights.
The Great Barrington Declaration – Signed by over 50,000 Health Professionals
As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.
Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.
Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.
Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.
As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.
The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk. We call this Focused Protection.
Adopting measures to protect the vulnerable should be the central aim of public health responses to COVID-19. By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent testing of other staff and all visitors. Staff rotation should be minimized. Retired people living at home should have groceries and other essentials delivered to their home. When possible, they should meet family members outside rather than inside. A comprehensive and detailed list of measures, including approaches to multi-generational households, can be implemented, and is well within the scope and capability of public health professionals.
Those who are not vulnerable should immediately be allowed to resume life as normal. Simple hygiene measures, such as hand washing and staying home when sick should be practiced by everyone to reduce the herd immunity threshold. Schools and universities should be open for in-person teaching. Extracurricular activities, such as sports, should be resumed. Young low-risk adults should work normally, rather than from home. Restaurants and other businesses should open. Arts, music, sport and other cultural activities should resume. People who are more at risk may participate if they wish, while society as a whole enjoys the protection conferred upon the vulnerable by those who have built up herd immunity.
Masking our humanity
April 11, 2021 (American Thinker) Recent NPR and Yahoo! News articles addressed the supposed “debate” over whether Americans should continue to wear masks, even after the COVID-19 pandemic is over, in perpetuity, until the sun expires.
There is no science – no real science – behind the mask mandates. The Centers for Disease Control inadvertently revealed the lack of scientific support for wearing masks to avoid contracting Covid-19 in their weekly morbidity and mortality report for September 11 last year. One of the statistics reported was that 85 percent of their sample of 153 symptomatic Covid patients reported wearing masks “always” or “often.”